Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. (RCBC) has disputed the recommendation of the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) to the Department of Justice (DOJ) to file criminal proceedings against six RCBC officials accused of failing to stop the laundering of $81 million stolen by cyber-criminals from Bangladesh’s central bank last February.
The electronic thieves shifted $81 million from the bank’s account with the US Federal Reserve in New York to accounts in RCBC in one of the world’s biggest bank heists.
In a statement, RCBC said it has yet to receive a copy of the AMLC complaints but that its own investigation did not show any culpability of its officials.
“Going by our independent internal investigation early this year, we believe that no head-office official was involved in the transaction that was initiated and carried out by key people in our Jupiter Makati branch,” RCBC President and CEO Gil Buenaventura said.
Still, Buenaventura said the bank welcomes the charges “as an opportunity to conclusively prove that our executives acted properly and had no knowledge or participation in any money laundering.”
“We are confident that the cases filed against these RCBC officers will be dismissed,” he added.
The stolen money was transferred to four accounts at an RCBC branch from where it was funneled into local casinos, according to regulators who fined the bank a record $21 million in August.
Charged in the the AMLC complaint-affidavit received by the DOJ were former Retail Banking Group head Raul Victor Tan, who resigned last April 20; National Sales Director of the Retail Banking Group Ismael Reyes; and Brigitte Capiña, director of the bank’sRetail Banking Group Regional Sales director.
Also included in the charges were Nestor Pineda, district sales director; Romualdo Agarrado, customer service head, Jupiter Business Center; and Angela Ruth Torres, senior customer relations officer of the Jupiter Business Center.
Torres was terminated from her job after RCBC investigation showed that she and then-RCBC Jupiter Branch Manager Maia Deguito violated bank policies and procedures and falsified commercial documents that paved the way for the laundering of the Bangladesh Bank funds.
The AMLC said it filed a criminal complaint at the DOJ against RCBC’s retail banking group head at the time, its national sales director and four other bank officials.
“The… respondent officers and employees of RCBC facilitated the suspicious transactions involving the four accounts above, by failing to conduct the requisite investigations and enquiries into the accounts,” the complaint read.
The complaint also cited the respondents’ “deliberate refusal to know the unlawful origins of the funds.”
Justice department prosecutors will decide, based on evidence presented by the money-laundering watchdog, whether to file criminal charges in court against the six.
The offense carries a maximum prison term of seven years and fines of up to P3 million.
No one has been arrested for the heist but the government has recovered about $15 million, some of it from a Manila-based casino operator who has pledged to cooperate with the criminal inquiry. The recovered funds have been turned over to Bangladesh Bank.
The brazen cyber heist highlighted banking loopholes that entice money launderers. An example cited was the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) policy that exempts casino transactions from scrutiny by the AMLC unless a case has been filed in court.
The complaint said AMLC investigations showed that the six RCBC officers “facilitated the suspicious transactions” that enabled the remittance of a total of $81 million to four US dollar accounts owned by Michael F. Cruz, Jessie Christopher M. Lagrosas, Alfred S. Vergara, and Enrico T. Vasquez last Feb. 4.
It said the respondents failed to “conduct the requisite investigations and inquiries into the accounts, their beneficiaries, and the transactions, attributable to their knowledge about the unlawful origins of the funds or their deliberate refusal to know the unlawful origins of the funds.”
The complaint said the six current and former RCBC officials did, in one way or another, acts that are in violation of the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA).
It cited that “knowledge, as an element of money laundering, may not necessarily be attributable to the doer of the predicate crime, but may be ascribed to persons who commit any of the acts stated in Section 4(a) to (f), as is plain from the statute, which does not identify the doer of a money laundering offense.”
It said Agarrado and Torres “failed to observe the Know-Your-Customer (KYC) rule required under AMLA while Tan, Reyes, Capiña, and Pineda failed to conduct Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) in dealing with the accounts.
”The evidence and circumstances therefore show that respondents recognized the certainty or likelihood that the accounts and transactions were involved in illegal activities, or at least suspected this. Despite this, respondents were deliberately remiss in their anti-money laundering obligations,” it added. LUIS LEONCIO