The Market Monitor Minding the Nation's Business
By David Espo / The Associated Press
Washington—Republicans fall into two camps when it comes to United States President Barack Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran.
Some are against it. Others want to read it before announcing their opposition.
Either way, they are laying down markers for next year’s campaigns for the White House and control of Congress. They question the deal’s impact on the security of Israel, and wonder aloud why anyone would trust Obama, whom they accuse of naively trusting the word of the Iranian leadership.
Obama offered a rebuttal at a White House news conference last Wednesday, inviting reporters to make sure they challenged him with each of the criticisms coming from Republicans so he could rebut them all. More broadly, he recommended that critics “read the agreement before they comment on it.”
It seemed a simple request on a diplomatic accord that politicians in both parties agree is a momentous event—particularly for Tea Party politicians who rode to power in 2010 vowing to read each and every bill they vote on.
But not all Republicans seem ready to grant his wish.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a presidential candidate, opposed the deal even before it had been completed, much less circulated for study. Earlier this week, he pledged to “terminate the bad deal with Iran” on his first day in the White House.
In the Senate, Republican Sen. Tom Cotton said the agreement was a “terrible, dangerous mistake…. The American people will repudiate this deal and I believe Congress will kill the deal.”
The first assertion sounded like a prediction about the 2016 election. The second pointed toward a struggle over a coming attempt by congressional Republicans to pass legislation that blocks Obama from lifting many economic and other sanctions whose removal are part of the core of the deal.
The Republican leadership sounded more open-minded, barely.
The Republican leader of the House, Speaker John Boehner, told reporters last week that Obama had abandoned all the goals he previously announced for a deal to lessen sanctions against Iran in exchange for concessions in Tehran’s nuclear program.
“It blows my mind that the administration would agree to lift the arms and missile bans and sanctions” in place, he added last Thursday at a news conference.
The Israeli question is a constant factor. “We think this is not only a threat to us. We think this is a threat to you as well,” Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu said in an interview with NBC, referring to the US.
His opposition is longstanding, and Boehner angered the White House earlier this year by inviting the Israeli leader to outline his concerns in an address to House lawmakers.
Even harder to predict is the impact on the competition among Republican presidential contenders for the support of a small number of very wealthy, conservative Jewish donors.
It is manifested in a competition among the hopefuls for the allegiance of billionaire Sheldon Adelson, a strong supporter of Netanyahu.
Among Democrats, former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the US must move ahead “with our eyes wide open” and that the deal “gives us a better chance than a lesser chance” to improve security for Israeli and other Mideast allies.