Stability over division

The idea of another “People Power” movement to oust President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr. has resurfaced, particularly within the Duterte camp. 

However, the likelihood of such an effort succeeding is slim.

The original People Power Revolution in 1986 was driven by widespread dissatisfaction and moral outrage against authoritarian rule, not orchestrated by a single faction. 

While past attempts, like the ousting of President Joseph Estrada in 2001, resonated with public grievances, today’s political climate is different. 

The Duterte camp, despite its significant support, would need a much broader coalition united by shared discontent—something that is currently lacking.

While President Marcos, Jr.’s administration faces challenges, it has not reached the crisis point that would mobilize the nation to revolt. Inflation and economic issues have not led to universal outrage, and Marcos still maintains a stable base of support.

The Filipino people are mindful of the consequences of political instability. Movements that threaten stability could backfire, especially if seen as politically motivated rather than addressing the public’s needs.

Instead of calling for upheaval, political leaders should focus on constructive criticism through institutional means—opposition, legislative advocacy, and community engagement—without risking national turmoil.

Ultimately, in a democracy, leadership change happens through elections, not through revolt. The prospect of a successful uprising against Marcos is unlikely without a unifying grievance, and Filipinos tend to favor stability over division.

The nation deserves leaders who prioritize progress and unity. 

As tensions persist, the focus must be on strengthening the country, not tearing it apart for political gain.