Lawful Return

The deportation of former Negros Oriental Representative Arnulfo Teves, Jr. to the Philippines marks a crucial step in the pursuit of justice and the reaffirmation of the rule of law.

Contrary to speculations and the claims of his camp, Teves was not abducted—his return was a lawful consequence of his fugitive status and the Philippine government’s consistent diplomatic efforts to hold him accountable.

For over a year, Teves had evaded arrest while facing multiple murder charges, including his alleged involvement in the brazen killing of Negros Oriental Governor Roel Degamo and several others.

His flight to Timor-Leste and eventual denial of political asylum there underscored the growing international consensus: a man accused of serious crimes cannot use foreign soil to escape accountability.

The process leading to Teves’ deportation followed established legal channels. The Department of Justice, through the Department of Foreign Affairs and in coordination with international partners, worked within the framework of international law to facilitate his repatriation.

Timor-Leste’s revocation of Teves’ asylum status was a sovereign decision that reflects the country’s recognition of the seriousness of the charges against him and its respect for due process.

To characterize Teves’ deportation as an “abduction,” as some of his allies suggest, is both misleading and dangerous. It disrespects the legal systems of both the Philippines and Timor-Leste and insults the memory of those who lost their lives in the March 2023 massacre that stunned the nation. It also undermines the trust of the public in institutions working to bring alleged perpetrators to justice.

The law must prevail over political theatrics. Teves will have his day in court, where he can defend himself and refute the allegations through due process—a right guaranteed by the very system he once served as a legislator.

His return, therefore, should not be sensationalized but seen for what it is: a lawful return of a fugitive to face the consequences of his alleged crimes.

Justice cannot be served in exile. It must be faced at home.