Dynastic Democracy

As the 68 million Filipinos decide today on the fate of the candidates in the 2025 midterm elections, the familiar specter of political dynasties and poll-related controversies once again looms large over the democratic process. 

Rather than being a celebration of the people’s will, the elections are increasingly viewed with skepticism, mired in allegations of vote-buying, disinformation, premature campaigning, and the perpetuation of entrenched political families.

The midterms should serve as a moment for renewal—a chance to recalibrate the national agenda, correct missteps, and give voice to new leaders and ideas. 

Instead, the electoral arena has been largely dominated by the same powerful names, many of whom are related by blood, marriage, or long-standing political alliances. 

This cyclical concentration of power within a select few families not only stifles political competition but also discourages the emergence of reform-minded leaders from outside the elite circles.

More concerning is the normalization of this dynastic politics despite its clear consequences: weakened accountability, patronage-driven governance, and policy-making that often prioritizes clan survival over public service. 

Constitutional provisions against political dynasties remain unenforced, as those with the power to legislate change are the very beneficiaries of the status quo.

Controversies surrounding the integrity of electoral processes only deepen public disillusionment. 

From questionable campaign funding sources to social media manipulation and digital vote suppression, the midterms are unfolding amid a climate of distrust. The Commission on Elections (COMELEC) is once again challenged to prove its independence and competence in ensuring a free, fair, and credible electoral exercise.

But the onus of change does not lie with institutions alone. Voters, civil society, and independent media must remain vigilant. 

Voter education is critical, especially in a political environment saturated with misleading narratives and manufactured popularity. Citizens must look beyond surnames, slogans, and spectacles, and assess candidates based on platforms, performance, and integrity.

If the 2025 elections are to matter beyond their procedural function, they must become an inflection point—a chance for Filipinos to challenge the entrenchment of dynastic rule and demand real accountability from those who seek to lead. 

Democracy, after all, is not merely about casting ballots; it is about claiming power back from those who have long treated public office as family inheritance.

The future of Philippine democracy depends on the courage to break the cycle. 

Are we ready?